the one annoying difference is when Howard Dean took over the internet it carried over into “old media”. Ron Paul isn’t getting that same treatment. Old media can’t seem to discuss Dr. Paul without adding longshot or fringe to his title. That kind of propoganda is hard to battle.

It behooves us Ron Paul supporters to work harder in this next month to ensure that when Iowa and New Hampshire straw polls occur, our candidate is in the number 1 or 2 position.

One element the isn’t discussed is that when Dean ran in 2004, he was competing only against a few formidable democrats at that time. Kerry and Edwards, and only Bush on the other side.

In 2008 we have a major free for all on our hands.

Gephardt, Leiberman and Clark folded early.

Dean also didn’t have the same problem of being ignored by the MSM that Rep. Paul has had to face.

But we do have some light shining on this campaign outside of some of the difficulties.

Senator McCain is dead for all intents and purposes. Fred Thompson is taking so long to come into the race that he may miss the boat completely for Aimes or New Hampshire plus his previous alliance with a pro-abortion group may hit him hard now in the polls. Thompson has a similar problem to Giuliani in that this is his third marriage.

Giuliani while still ahead in the polls has far to many skeletons in his particular closet to maintain that lead for long. The IAFF video sure isn’t going to help his campaign.

Romney is the only one that doesn’t have money or skeleton problems but he does seem to be unable to get donations from middle America.

He is not only 9 million in the hole from his own pocket book, it makes him look like he, not the American people truly want him in office.

Another nice benefit is that Dr. Paul has far more Supporters at this point than Dean had Deaniacs.

Thanks again for the summation.